Image
  • Home
  • Book Reviews
  • About
    • About Road to Hellth
    • About Dr. Perednia
  • Contact Us
  • Legal
    • Disclosure Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of Use
  • Login

Archive for November 2011

Nov
27

Why Does the Cost of Healthcare Keep Going Up?

by Dr. Doug Perednia

Not long ago, the News Director at 1110 KBND radio in Bend, Oregon asked us a simple question: “Why does the cost of healthcare keep going up?”  Initially it seemed that the answer should be perfectly obvious.  After all, hasn’t everyone been keeping up with what’s been going on in the Obama Administration and in Congress and in the states and with the healthcare reform law?  Doesn’t anyone read this blog?  And then it occurred to us: “Of course not!  Are you nuts?”  The vast majority of us have no idea why their health insurance premiums are going up by 9% each year.  In fact, the great majority of our political and economic leaders don’t seem to have the slightest clue as to what’s going on or why.  If they did, how could they possibly create laws, rules and regulations that run so counter to common sense and the best interests of their constituents?  So we thought we’d try to put things in terms that anybody with a head on their shoulders and experience with what doctors call “activities of daily living” ought to be able to relate to.  Did we succeed?  You be the judge, for this is what we wrote in reply:

“The short answer is that prices are responding to: (1) artificially high demand; (2) the absence of a free market for healthcare goods and services that would tend to automatically balance supply and demand; and (3) the relentlessly increasing cost of administrative overhead caused by government regulation and insurance company practices.  But to really help us understand how all of this is happening and why, let’s perform a thought experiment using a slightly different industry where each person likes to be treated as an individual: the hair cutting and styling business.

Right now when you go to Supercuts, a barber or a hair salon, you have a list of things that you want done that is tailored to fit your needs.  In addition, you also have detailed information about how much each of those goods or services cost, and whether each of those things is worth the price that you’re willing to pay given your budget and how much your hair is bothering you.  Because hair care is a free market, how much we spend is a balancing act between supply and demand.  Price is the signal that is used to automatically regulate the two.  Other things equal, the higher the price, the less people can afford to buy and the more providers are willing to supply.  Both behaviors will tend to bring the price back down.  The system works pretty well and is very efficient; no one has to do anything that they wouldn’t have done automatically.  There’s no special administration cost to the system, so overhead is low.  Now let’s introduce some changes that parallel what’s happened in healthcare and see what happens.

The first change we’ll make is to create hair insurance that covers you not just for the catastrophic loss or destruction of your hair, but also for routine maintenance such as cutting and shampooing.  To make it even easier for many union members, executives, the poor, prison inmates, most seniors and those with disabilities, we’re going to waive any co-pays or cost sharing for hair care or hair products.  They can go for hair care as often as they need to, and their insurance companies and state and federal governments will pick up the tab.  That’s a lot of people: over one hundred million of them, or about one-third of the entire population.

Since these folks pay little or nothing for their hairdos, it’s pretty easy to imagine that few, if any, of them are going to take cost into account when they head to their local hair care provider.  No matter how much the price of hair care products and services increases, they themselves won’t pay a penny more.  So price is gone as a useful means of telling just how much a haircut, perm or highlighting is worth to them.

To complicate things further, the second thing we’re going to do is take down that list of prices off the wall where it’s readily seen by everyone.  Instead, we’ll replace it with hundreds of different hidden prices for each individual good or service available.  The price of everything will now depend upon who is paying, what specific hair insurance plan is involved, where you are in the country and literally dozens of other factors.  Even if you wanted to know how much something costs, it’s nearly impossible to find out.  What’s even more amazing is that these prices are fixed by the government and private hair insurers without any consideration for how much these goods and services actually cost to produce.  Perversely, the people who pay the most are those who have to pay cash out of their own pocket.

What effect does this have?  For one thing, since price was the signal that we had previously used to balance supply and demand, the supply side of that equation is thrown out of kilter.  Even your barber can’t tell you how much revenue your haircut is going generate – he has no idea what your insurer is going to pay or what they’ll agree to cover.  For another, insurers who don’t pay providers enough will increase costs for everyone else.

In the real world, Medicare and Medicaid often don’t pay anywhere near the actual cost of the care provided to their beneficiaries, so the only way many doctors and hospitals can stay in business is to make up the difference by charging private insurers more.  Of course insurers simply pass on that cost in the form of premium increases to businesses and individuals.  Every time you hear about Medicare and Medicaid cutting payments to providers, you can count on seeing an increase in your own health insurance premiums.  As a side note, the recent healthcare reform bill requires Medicare to cut payments to providers by $500 billion over the next ten years, while in his most recent proposal President Obama has asked the Congressional “super committee” to cut $248 billion more.  If doctors and hospitals keep seeing Medicare patients, all of this will ultimately be passed on to businesses and individuals.  It’s no exaggeration to say that federal cost-shifting from Medicare and Medicaid is steadily destroying our ability to afford regular insurance and pay out-of-pocket for care.

Finally, someone has to keep track of all of these prices.  That brings us to another very important piece of the cost puzzle – an explosion of rules regulations and administrative overhead.  Let’s go back to our “hair care” thought experiment.

The presence of all of these insurers and all of these plans means that the process of billing has gotten very complicated for hair stylists everywhere.  Where you used to hand them some cash or a credit card, now they have to hire dedicated staff or entire companies to do the billing for them.  Meanwhile as costs rise, insurers try to reduce payments by requiring more and more paperwork to document the need for every haircut, highlighting and bottle of Brazilian Blowout.  As one means of limiting expenditures, government insurers officially announce that they will only pay for “high quality” hair care.  To enforce this, they begin to require increasing levels of documentation from barbers and stylists each year.  All hair care providers have to add ever more expensive levels of “certification” their credentials.  To help track what barbers and stylists do, the federal government mandates that all hair providers and salons must spend billions of dollars on expensive and hard-to-use electronic record keeping systems that record each cut, tint and perm.  To support all of this paperwork and recordkeeping, barbers and stylists end up employing scads of administrators; currently more than five for each person who actually wields a pair of scissors.

All of this might sound far-fetched, but all of this is exactly what’s happened in the healthcare industry, and it’s an important reason why the cost of everything from insurance premiums to well-baby checks keeps rising every year.  Right now, about one-third of every dollar spent on healthcare goes for administrative overhead.  That’s over half a trillion dollars each year.  Every time clinicians turn around, there are more requirements, more standards, more paperwork and more guidelines that they have to follow in order to stay within the law.  It costs a phenomenal amount of money.

Where does the new healthcare reform law fit into the picture?  Is it adding to the increase in costs that we’re seeing now?  To a certain extent, it is.  For example, the law requires health insurers to pay for a routine health screening visit for every insured person each year.  Since the vast majority of people are well, this increases everyone’s costs now, while any savings (if there are any) won’t be seen for years.  The law also allows children up to age 26 to be placed on their parent’s healthcare policies.  This will naturally increase the cost of insurance to parents and the businesses that insure them.

However these sort of immediate costs are dwarfed by new expenses that the law will incur in future years.  Remember when we talked about how the losses generated by Medicare and Medicaid patients have to be subsidized by higher costs for private insurance and those paying out-of-pocket for care?  By 2014, the Affordable Care Act will add sixteen million additional people to the Medicaid program.  If you have private insurance, your premiums will inevitably jump yet again to cover this new expense, as well as the huge cuts in Medicare payments that the law requires.  The law also adds huge amounts of additional complexity to the existing healthcare system.

If you’re worried about the rising cost of healthcare, I’m sorry to say that with our current healthcare policies, there’s just no good news on the horizon.  If you’re not, then you should be.”

It would be fascinating to see a Presidential debate focused solely on the topic of healthcare, with the very first question being: “Please explain to us why you believe that the cost of healthcare keeps going up.”  Sad to say, we seriously doubt that any of the participants – including President Obama – really understand it on even the most basic level.

Categories : Economics, Healthcare Policy, Political Hellth, Politics
Nov
17

America’s War On Doctors

by Dr. Doug Perednia

In his 2009 address to the American Medical Association, President Obama famously declared that under his healthcare reform plan, “If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor.  Period.”

What he failed to mention is that soon many Americans will be lucky to find a doctor to care for them at all.  The Association of American Medical Colleges estimates that there will be a shortage of 91,000 primary care and specialist physicians by 2020, and over 130,000 by 2025.  Once the dominant force in U.S. healthcare, physicians are increasingly being crowded out by a combination of government regulations, bureaucratic red tape and competition from non-physician providers seeking equivalent pay, titles and the ability to practice without physician supervision.  At stake is exactly who will make the decisions that directly affect patient care and $1.75 trillion in annual expenditures for medical diagnoses and treatments.

Attacks on physician-based care come from many different directions, but they all have a common denominator: a desire to control medical decision-making and the money that goes with it.  In the mid-1990s Medicare, Medicaid and private insurers began to reduce the range and independence of medical decisions by creating drug formularies and requiring pre-authorizations for referrals, tests and treatments.  In recent years the federal government has become increasingly prescriptive in its use of medical guidelines and “quality” initiatives that, in practice, dictate care and take decisions out of the hands of doctors and their patients.  Nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) have taken advantage of this trend to argue that they can implement standardized care directives as well as physicians, and should be compensated accordingly.  Medicare clearly agrees.  The Medicare Payment Advisory Board recently recommended that primary care nurse practitioners and physician assistants be paid more than physician specialists, despite an enormous difference in training, (e.g., urologists have 15,000 to 17,000 hours of training, compared with 750 and 1,500 hours for nurse practitioners.)  Just last month, the Obama Administration recommended replacing physicians with nurse practitioners and physician assistants in 6,000 hospitals “in view of impending physician shortages” as part of its efforts to “cut red tape”.

It’s too bad that government policies and red tape are what’s depriving patients of their doctors in the first place.

There are many ways to cause a shortage of doctors.  The first is to increase demand.  ObamaCare did this by adding at least 32 million people to the roles of the insured by 2015 – more than 90 new patients for every primary care physician.  Long lines and appointment delays are the perfect justification for moving to care that is “mass produced” by using standardized guidelines and monitored for compliance via government-mandated electronic record systems.

The second is to limit supply.  Last month, President Obama asked Congress to reduce Medicare funding for medical residency training positions by 10% – a reduction that comes on top of a freeze that Congress imposed fifteen years ago.  This policy will reduce the supply of new doctors by about 3.5% each year.  Since all physicians must complete a three to ten year post-graduate residency, it will virtually guarantee that there will not be enough trained physicians to care for the 16 million baby boomers who will be added to Medicare by 2020.

A third technique is to reduce physician productivity.  Each year, an overwhelming combination of mandates, regulations, insurance rules and the pointlessly-complex-but-federally-mandated RBRVS payment system substantially reduces the amount of time doctors have to spend with patients.  U.S. physicians now spend 40% of their time filling out paperwork; twice as much as twenty years ago.  The clinical impact of all this busywork is exactly the same as removing tens of thousands of doctors from patient care.

Finally, one can simply make doctors want to quit; mere child’s play for any self-respecting bureaucracy.  The Massachusetts Medical Association’s physician practice environment index –  a measure describing how favorable the business climate is for medical practice – has plummeted 25% since 1993.  Real physician income has been falling for the past fifteen years, while medical liability costs, overhead and bureaucratic hassles are at all-time highs.  Government “quality” initiatives produce endless accounting and reporting nightmares, but precious little quality.  With forty-five percent of the country’s physicians age 55 or older, many physicians are simply waiting for their retirement accounts to regain value before throwing in the towel.

Which brings us back to the President’s promise.  Having and keeping your doctor isn’t a big deal for the young and healthy, but that changes fast with illness and age.  NPs and PAs are fine for simple problems and routine checkups, but they lack the training to diagnose and manage complex cases.  It’s the difference between a trained mechanic and the guy who changes your oil at Jiffy-Lube.  Bureaucracy’s war on physicians might reduce healthcare costs in the short run, but only in the same way that a shortage of mechanics will save money at the auto shop.  In just a few short years, there are going to be an awful lot of Americans who just can’t get the repairs they need.

Categories : Clinical Care, Economics, Ethics, Healthcare Policy, Political Hellth, Politics, The Practice of Medicine
Nov
3

The Burden of Federal Paperwork In Healthcare

by Dr. Doug Perednia

We end up talking about bureaucracy a great deal on this blog because, well, there is an awful lot of bureaucracy involved in America’s highly regulated healthcare system.  It doesn’t really matter whether you’re a doctor or a patient, there are always a ridiculous number of forms to fill out, reports to complete, questionnaires to complete or pages to sign.

How many pages are there?  Frankly, no one knows.  There are far too many sources creating these things, including over 3,000 private health insurers, Medicare, Medicaid, the FDA, DEA, CDC, the Veterans Administration, disability insurers, and what must be hundreds of other state and federal agencies that regulate healthcare one way or another.  And that does not include all of the people and organizations whom we would normally consider to be “providers” of clinical care.  Go to any hospital or ambulatory care center for a simple out-patient surgery and you’ll be inundated with forms, questionnaires, waivers, notifications and notices.  The same thing applies more or less to medical practices and pharmacies.

However thanks to the Paperwork Reduction Act, at least the federal government is required to estimate how much time all of us have to spend filling out paperwork required in order to comply with federally mandated laws, rules and regulations.  The totals are mind-boggling.  They’re spelled out in a 314-page document entitled “The Information collection Budget of the United States, 2011”.

Looking at Figure 1 from this report there are a couple of things that stand out.  First, the number of hours Americans had to spend filling out paperwork for the federal government grew by over 34% between 2000 and 2009, from approximately 7.3 billion hours to about 9.8 billion hours.  The total then fell considerably in 2010 to 8.8 billion hours in 2010, for a net increase of only 21% between 2000 and 2010.

Federal Paperwork Burden 2011

(Click on graph to enlarge)

In the way of explanation, the dashed red line indicates the burden of paperwork that is “discretionary” as far as government agencies are concerned, i.e., it’s paperwork that the agencies chose to impose because they thought it was a good idea.  The blue line depicts the sum of discretionary paperwork plus paperwork imposed as the result of Congressional legislation.

You might think that a decline of one billion hours in a single year is great news, except the reduction is almost entirely due to federal agencies deciding that filling out their forms didn’t take as much time as they thought it did.  The forms hadn’t changed, just their estimates of how long it took to fill them out.  In Washington terms, you might say that all of those extra hours went “off budget”.  Figure 2 shows the causes of changes in estimated paperwork burden for each year.  As you can see, a substantial amount of the decline due to changes in estimates was offset by new laws requiring the collection of yet more information.  These new laws increased the amount of paperwork by 352 million hours in fiscal year 2010 alone.  Over 15 million of those hours were attributed to the earliest stages of the Affordable Care Act (“ObamaCare”).

Causes of Change in Paperwork Burden

(Click on graph to enlarge)

Naturally not all government agencies are identical in terms of the paperwork burden they incur.  It makes sense that the Department of the Treasury accounts for the most – 6.4 billion of the 8.7 billion hours, some 74% of the total.  The vast majority of this consists of income tax filings.

But to patients, clinicians and anyone else interested in healthcare, the real story isn’t so much in the total government numbers, but the astonishing and unrelenting increase in both the amount of paperwork directed at healthcare, and healthcare’s share of the total federal regulatory paperwork burden.  For the purposes of assessing we’ll remove the numbers for the U.S. Treasury.  The burden of tax filing is rather unique in that: (1) it affects virtually everyone in the country; and (2) it’s more akin to billing than regulation.

We crunched the numbers from all of the federal government’s “Information Budget” reports since 1999.  The next figure shows what happens if you remove all of the regulatory paperwork attributable to the Department of Treasury, and compare what’s left to the paperwork generated solely by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

HHS vs Non-Treasury Federal Paperwork Burden

(Click on graph to enlarge)

After the Treasury Department, HHS is the single most burdensome agency in the federal government with respect to paperwork.  It accounted for 542 million hours in FY 2010, a staggering 331% increase since 1999.  Only 15 million of those hours were attributed to the earliest stages of the Affordable Care Act (“ObamaCare”).  That shouldn’t be surprising.  After all, the vast majority of ACA regulations don’t kick in after 2013.  After that the number and invasiveness of the law’s provisions escalate rapidly, and the paperwork that it requires will as well.

If we take a close look at this graph, here are a couple of things that really stand out.  First, since 1999 the amount of healthcare-related paperwork has been doubling every five years.  Second, remember how the amount of federal paperwork “fell” in 2010 when the government decided to re-estimate how much time it took to fill out its forms?  Instead of dropping as it did for many other departments, the total number of hours required to complete healthcare paperwork actually rose.  This can only have occurred if: (a) HHS did not reduce the estimated number of hours per form; (b) the volume of forms increased, or a combination of the two.  The report does not tell us whether or not HHS re-estimated the time required to complete its forms.  If it did, the total increase in the number of HHS forms required in 2010 was very large indeed.

Another way of looking at the burden of HHS-related paperwork is to measure it as a proportion of all non-Treasury paperwork that Americans have to complete in the course of each year.  This information is shown in the graph below.

HHS Percentage of Non-Treasury Paperwork Burden

(Click on graph to enlarge)

As you can see, the paperwork required by HHS is growing so fast that it now accounts for almost 40% of all non-Treasury paperwork required – dwarfing the individual contributions of agencies like the EPA (which regulates every discharge in the nation), the SEC (which regulates Wall Street and all of the financial markets), the Department of Homeland Security (which covers immigration and security at every port of entry in the nation), the USDA (which inspects every food processing center and slaughterhouse), and even a Department of Labor that covers every single worker and employer in the country.

Another interesting statistic coming from the report is that HHS is also the nation’s foremost violator of the Federal Paperwork Reduction Act:

“OMB is reporting 110 violations during FY 2010. This is an increase of 34 violations from FY 2009 and an increase of 57 violations from FY 2008. This increase is largely driven by the 65 PRA violations from Department of Health and Human Services, which represents nearly 60 percent of the total violations in FY 2010.”

Most of these violations occur because HHS place forms into use before OMB approval has been obtained.  They go away when OMB approves the forms, which it always seems to do.

Frankly, all of these numbers are a bit numbing after a while.  As Stalin once said, “One death is a tragedy; one million is a statistic.”  What does 542 million hours filling out paperwork really mean?  Consider this.  It’s equivalent to 271,000 people employed in the private sector, doing absolutely nothing day in and day out other than completing paperwork at the behest of HHS.  If these people were all in a single private company, it would be the 13th largest employer in the U.S., right between Kroger and Albertson’s.  Given the trend of the past decade, however, the number of full-time employees needed to fill out forms for HHS will double to 542,000 by 2015.  This will make HHS paperwork the second largest employer in the country, right behind Wal-Mart.  If we assume that each of these people is making an average of $35,000 per year plus $10,000 in benefits, the total cost in 2015 will be just under $25 billion.  That’s just the lowball estimation of paperwork cost for one agency, for one year; and it doesn’t even include the enormous increases that will occur as a result of the Affordable Care Act.

Of course there probably are very few people who really are employed full-time filling out forms for HHS, but the economic impact of this particular government regulation is exactly the same as if there were.  That means that really, millions upon millions of people are involved.  The private sector personnel affected are patients, physicians, and the hordes of people hired by hospitals, clinics, nursing homes and private offices to fill out these forms for them.  Now add to these all of the forms these same people have to fill out for private insurers, disability insurance, and everyone else, and you’re talking serious, budget-busting costs.  If you want to know why your insurance premiums are rising at 9% per year, this is a big part of the answer.

Categories : Bureaucracy Run Amok, Business and Law, Economics, Ethics, Healthcare Policy, Politics

RTH Post Categories

RTH Archives

  • February 2013 (1)
  • November 2012 (1)
  • October 2012 (1)
  • August 2012 (2)
  • July 2012 (2)
  • June 2012 (2)
  • May 2012 (4)
  • April 2012 (2)
  • March 2012 (5)
  • February 2012 (3)
  • January 2012 (4)
  • December 2011 (3)
  • November 2011 (3)
  • October 2011 (3)
  • September 2011 (4)
  • August 2011 (5)
  • July 2011 (3)
  • June 2011 (5)
  • May 2011 (4)
  • April 2011 (7)
  • March 2011 (4)
  • February 2011 (5)
  • January 2011 (5)
  • December 2010 (3)
  • November 2010 (3)
  • October 2010 (4)
  • September 2010 (4)
  • August 2010 (1)
  • July 2010 (3)
  • June 2010 (5)
  • May 2010 (6)
  • April 2010 (7)
  • March 2010 (8)
  • February 2010 (10)
  • January 2010 (6)
  • December 2009 (2)

Search RTH

RTH Recommends

  • Dalai's PACS Blog
  • DB's Medical Rants
  • Dr. Wes
  • Health Care Renewal
  • Musings of a Dinosaur
  • Retired Doc's Thoughts
  • Shrink Rap
  • The Covert Rationing Blog
  • The Happy Hospitalist
  • The Jobbing Doctor
  • The M.D.O.D. Blog
  • WSJ Health Blog

Send To My Kindle

your kindle user name:
(you@kindle.com, without @kindle.com)
Approved E-mail:
(Approved E-mail that kindle will accept)
Kindle base email kindle.com | free.kindle.com
(Use kindle.com to download on wispernet or wifi, use free.kindle.com for wifi only.)
using kindle.com may incur charges)

Recent Comments

  • Dr. Doug Perednia on Oregon’s Magical Thinking Meets CCO Reality
  • Andrew_M_Garland on Oregon’s Magical Thinking Meets CCO Reality
  • Andrew_M_Garland on Medical Specialty Certification Exams: The Real Scandal
  • Andrew_M_Garland on Emergency Medicine Goes Down the Rabbit Hole in the Evergreen State
  • Porty11 on Emergency Medicine Goes Down the Rabbit Hole in the Evergreen State
Road To Hellth
Copyright © 2013 All Rights Reserved
iThemes Builder by iThemes
Powered by WordPress